Can Wii U’s Hardware Live Up to Nintendo’s Third Party Aspirations?

Robert On April 13, 2012 13.04.2012 with 12 Comments

Reports have been coming in for awhile now about the Wii U development kits, and it seems that most developers feel that the console will have around the same power as the 360 and PS3. Some say it is a bit more powerful, some say it is a bit less, but it’s starting to sound like the Wii U will not offer a significant graphical advantage over the next round of consoles from Microsoft and Sony. If Nintendo wants to lure big third party franchises, this is going to to be a problem.

While the Wii was underpowered compared to its competitors, it was also a very different type of system. It was truly a revolution in gaming, focusing more on inclusive innovative gameplay over bleeding edge graphics. With the Wii (and also the DS), Nintendo returned to its roots of simple, fun, arcade style games.  Sure the big epic third party games stuck mainly to the competition, but the Wii offered everyone something to enjoy, with Nintendo’s classic games and new franchises that appealed to such a wide audience, like Wii Sports and Wii Fit. It was classic blue ocean strategy and it paid off big time with the Wii being Nintendo’s best selling system ever.

The Wii U appears to be something very different. Nintendo seems to be putting a lot of effort into ensuring people that this system will have the big third party franchises as well. Where the Wii was designed to bring in new gamers and welcome back lapsed old-school gamers, the Wii U looks more like an attack on the markets currently dominated by the 360 and PS3 (classic red ocean strategy). Look at the known lineup for games on Wii U: Darksiders 2. Assassin’s Creed 3. Arkham City. Aliens: Colonial Marines. Perhaps even the Old Republic. It is clear that Nintendo is targeting a very different type of audience with the Wii U, and it could work…  …for awhile.

The problem is, what happens when the competing systems come out and are more powerful? Sure, Wii U owners will have Assassin’s Creed 3, but what about 4? Or the next Batman game? Or Darksiders 3? Will third parties, now developing their big franchises for significantly more powerful systems, bother to scale down versions of the game for Wii U? Considering the history of the Wii, I’m betting not. If Nintendo’s big direction with the Wii U is to strike at the heart of Microsoft and Sony’s market by capturing these (dare I say) hardcore franchises, a comparatively weaker system is going to fizzle out pretty quick.

Nintendo has to be considering this, and there is a good chance that they are going this route because they suspect that the the next generation of competing systems may either not be as powerful as expected or may simply be late to the game.

There is the possibility that Microsoft and Sony are not planning to release new systems for some time. Given the state of the economy and the fact that the 360 and PS3 are now profitable after years of bleeding cash, Microsoft and Sony may wait another 2 or even 3 years to release true successors to their consoles. In the meantime, they may fine tune, bundle and drop the price of their existing consoles. If so, Nintendo may be able to keep that hardcore market for another year or two after the next gen systems launch before releasing yet another system of their own, fully capable of luring third party support.

Another possibility is that the Wii so disrupted the market that Microsoft and Sony’s net consoles will also not offer significantly more power. The next XBox could be a more casual, family friendly system fully integrated with Kinect. It would certainly help them capture a market they’ve been desperately chasing for the last 3 or 4 years. If that is the case, then the Wii U might compare quite nicely and we have no problem getting, say, the next Grand Theft Auto.

I have no doubt that the Wii U is going to offer us Nintendo fans the classics. We’re going to get Mario. We’re going to get Zelda. We’re going to get Smash Bros., Metroid and Mario Kart. The problem is, I can’t shake the feeling that this third party love will be fleeting – that the first couple of years of the Wii U will offer everything the competition has and more, but that these games will start to evaporate as third parties move on to more powerful systems. At the core of the problem is that the the hardware does not match the purpose of the console. If the purpose of the console is to lure those third party franchises back, it’s only designed to do so in the first 1 to 2 years of the system’s life. For some of us, that won’t be a problem. For me personally, I’d be just fine – I loved the Wii and I mainly play Nintendo games – but right now, the Wii U has that bait-and-switch feel to it. I feel like I’m being tricked into thinking the system is something that it’s not. Obviously, we’ll have to wait until E3 to get more information. Who knows, perhaps everything will change!

12 Responses to “Can Wii U’s Hardware Live Up to Nintendo’s Third Party Aspirations?”

  1. Eyes says:

    I think Nintendo wants to assure a great launch line-up with better third party support to build relations that will last some time.
    But seen from Nintendo’s WiiU demo’s, they will still keep their blue ocean strategy. They’re basically filling the ‘hardcore’ gap that the recent Wii has.

  2. Hitokiri_Ace says:

    Well said Robert. I agree. It seems like it won’t be “that” much better than the current consoles. Which is a little disappointing to me really. Not that I really care for the 3rd party software anywho, I’d still like some advanced capabilities/specs.

    I will love Nintendo for their games, and I will purchase every console they make to get those games. Zelda, Mario, Smash Bros., Metroid, Donkey Kong.. and Halo (for campaign).. I won’t be hurt if they don’t have much 3rd party supports.. Seems like they haven’t for quite a while anywho, and they’re doing just fine.

    I wish it’d be the awesome, high-spec’d machine we dream about, but that’s just not feasible without taking huge loses for the first year or two. Nintendo likes to make money on consoles. Of course since it’ll cost probably… about $300, they’ll use maybe $180-$250 in production fees. Make some money slowly at first, and lower prices a year down the road.

    They are a business, sadly. Not the extended family I imagine them as, so they can’t just throw all that money around for no return.

    My point? …. I think I lost it. lol Nintendo is awesome, WiiU looks sweet. I can’t wait to pre-order it. :)

  3. Keith says:

    My concern isn’t even about the graphics which is what so many people jump to when talking about more power. I think the next generation isn’t going to be so much about the leap in graphics, but in processing power. Things like AI & number of characters on screen are where we will see the major leaps & I don’t know if people are going to go for dumbed down versions of those major franchises. Just have to wait for E3 to see how it shakes out.

  4. frstOne says:

    @Keith: the promise of vastly improved AI for the current generation was not fulfilled, and I don’t believe it will be for the next generation. Take for instance PS3: developers often used the extra general processing power on the hardware just for matching xbox360 graphics, in expense of AI, sound or other areas.

  5. EdEN says:

    We all buy Nintendo consoles/portables for Nintendo’s own games. Anything on top of that is just great news, and I always try to buy 3rd party releases that put an effort on Nintendo’s consoles (even when they are multiplatform releases).

    Now… did we all forget about the Zelda real time demo? Because that sure as hell looked a lot better than Uncharted 3. Or the bird/seasons one?

    Rumors are all over the place, and sometimes people forget they are RUMORS. E3 2012 is 2 months away, so we’ll finally be able to see what the console is all about, as well as learn about how much of an improvement the graphics are over 360/PS3.

    Me? I couldn’t care less if it goes over or under the 360/PS3. I’m buying it either way.

  6. Josh says:

    I don’t even own an Xbox360 or PS3 so it will be a huge improvement for me no matter what. I’m stoked! I’m currently playing Skyward Sword and it’s an amazing game, but the graphics are looking extremely dated.

  7. John says:

    Sadly the Wii U (so far) looks awful. I’ll just look to my 3DS for my Nintendo cravings unless Nintendo steps up their game. This is the first Nintendo console that I don’t plan on purchasing….sad.

  8. EdEN says:

    @John: It looks aweful from what? The gorgeous Zelda video, the bird/weather video, or the Aliens trailer?

  9. nin says:

    i don’t remember if there is a rule against posting links to videos, but i believe this may be relevant in squashing these rumors http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcnsG11MRE8&feature=g-all-lik&context=G2a4e5a3FAAAAAAAAAAA

  10. nin says:

    wow, that formatted my text weird

  11. The Adza says:

    I am hoping beyond hoping that there is a decent bump in the graphics department over the current HD consoles.

  12. Kaherka says:

    My main worry with the Wii U is that it won’t support multiple people all using the Wii U controller.

Leave a Reply