hello world.

Why star classification would fix game reviews

Wednesday, October 31st, 2007 at 1:10pm by Dan

Star classification should be used in game reviewsKotaku’s Mark Wilson perceptively describes the current and outdated state of video game reviews.

If there is no such thing as a perfect game, then why are you scoring out of 100?… Movie reviewers solved this problem a long time ago. That’s why most adopted a simpler rating system in which a 4-star movie didn’t imply “perfection” but supreme excellence.

The star classification system (preferably four over five) just works better. It would allow gamers to quickly gauge a game’s quality while paying more attention to the actual review, all without taking the review score too seriously. One star is “poor.” Two stars “mediocre.” Three stars “good,” and four stars “excellent” (never perfect).

Then again, Metacritic would just convert the score to a 10-point scale, but at least you’re doing your part.

22 Comments

Post a comment


COMMENT RULES: Infendo welcomes thoughtful and critical comments. But if you're rude, off-topic, or vulgar, we'll delete your stuff. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation.
Want speed commenting? Login or register for free to become a member.