Top 7 Nintendo mistakes don’t include the Wii
Tuesday, April 10th, 2007 at 12:54pm by Staff
Games Radar has a feature today on Nintendo’s seven deadly sins (or mistakes). It’s almost as hot as Blake’s new Infendo header. Almost.
The feature is a nostalgic walk through of the absolute worst of Nintendo’s storied history. The Virtual Boy; strong arming third parties to the point that the U.S. government had to get involved; all but a handful of games on the Nintendo 64; and the now infamous backstabbing that Nintendo did to Sony over a “new” technology called CD-ROMs. You know the result of that video game history debacle: the PlayStation. “Nintendo effectively created its own worst enemy,” says Games Radar features writer Brett Elston. And he’s right. Mostly.
All those things I mentioned above, they all happened and they’re an embarrassment. Especially for a Japanese company. There’s no honor in slapping a company across the face the day after you sign a huge console deal with them. Even if it was Sony (I kid Phil Harrison, honestly). Absolute power corrupts absolutely and Nintendo was a poster child for that cliche.
But placing the Wii as #7 in this list is just a foolish way to garner page views.
Can the same magic that made the DS an international phenomenon happen with a console? Nintendo’s betting on it. Betting it all, really. Because what do you do next? Five years from now, when the PS4 and NextBox show up, they’re going to jump in hardware power again. And then Nintendo’s left with a machine that looks two generations old instead of one. The motion controls, now considered somewhere in between “the best damn thing that’s ever happened in the world” to “gimmicky stupid childish nonsense,” will be super played out and exploited. Unless there’s some other gameplay innovation on the horizon, Wii could be viewed as a fad, susceptible to the same fickle emotions that killed snap bracelets, pet rocks and Sega. And if Nintendo bites the bullet and gives the machine a visual kick in the pants, well there goes its whole mantra that graphics don’t matter. There’s just enough steam with this idea to last one generation, and none after that. Today, the Wii is insanely popular with almost every audience. But if this wave of good vibes ever ends, Nintendo’s gonna be stranded.
So true! And “if” this atmosphere thing covering our planet ever ends, we all gonna die.
It’s a good thing we established this is a Games Radar column, because a lot of what I’m seeing here is baseless hyperbole and opinion based on assumption. A PS4? Says who? A visual kick in the pants would be hypocritical if it was for a completely new system four years down the line? How so? Last I checked, every Nintendo system was different from the last, and no one cried foul on that. And if the Wii really takes off, and I mean like the DS has, then who’s to say Microsoft makes an even more powerful system next time around? Why would they or Sony waste their money when the Wii/DS model was so wildly successful?
What this column is, really, is another example of someone or some company that has no clue how to respond to Nintendo’s new chosen path. Even if PS4 hits store shelves in five years, do you really think Nintendo cares? Do you think its customers — and I’m talking the people having a blast right now with dated technology — will care? I’m going to throw Brett Elston a bone on this one, and assume (*gasp!*) that this colum was written before Blake’s Ubisoft/EA post yesterday. You know, the one where EA said it missed out on millions of dollars because it was too slow to act on Wii development? The one where Ubisoft made an additional $405 million because of the Wii? The quality of some of these games be damned for now, because money talks, and developers are shifting resources to confirm that.
Even the six other mistakes listed in the article are just a history lesson of how the gaming industry WAS, not how it is GOING TO BE if Nintendo’s strategy with the Wii takes hold in a year or two. The Virtual Boy? CD-ROMs? Hiroshi Yamauchi? Are you kidding me? These are the skeletons in Nintendo’s closet, to be sure, but if you as a gaming journalist cannot see that the past 2-3 years have been a major restructuring and about face at Nintendo you need to start looking for work. Like with Sony’s PlayStation marketing department.
In many ways, the Wii launch has been MORE successful than the DS, and some people are STILL calling it a gimmick. For someone who wrote a fairly detailed history lesson on Nintendo’s foibles and repeating its mistakes, Mr. Elston himself seems incapable of reviewing just the past two years. Unfortunately for columnists like this, they’re wrong, and like EA, they’re going to lose unless they start thinking differently. I think some turtleneck wearing guy named Steve told me that once. I wonder what happened to him.
[Inspired by roo_303]





April 10th, 2007 at 2:14 pm
You ever notice how Nintendo’s success just bothers people? Maybe it was because they never beat world 8 in Super Mario Bros. (I’m still working on that) or possibly Castlevania was just too freaking hard. I think we all just need to ask these people “Hey, did Nintendo hurt you?”
April 10th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
GREAT POST!
I’ve read a lot of critics that say that Wii can’t possibly sustain its momentum to three or four years down the road… Well, of course!! No console today can do that, no matter how much technology you throw at it!
What Mr. Elston can’t see is that the success of DS and Wii stemmed from the fresh approach to interactive entertainment, not from the gimmick they used to achieve it. If he looked closer, he would have predicted that Nintendo was going to pull out another trick from their sleeve in two or three years. THAT’S what their new “blue ocean” strategy is all about: Look around for what people would like to do with established and cheap technology that hasn’t been exploited, and make a fun toy out of it.
April 10th, 2007 at 3:20 pm
Hear, hear!
April 10th, 2007 at 3:41 pm
All those mistakes and they are still in the video game business. Here’s another article with covering mistakes from the entire video game industry.
http://www.stingygaming.com/news.asp?ID=148
April 10th, 2007 at 8:29 pm
This article isn’t even worth discussing; it’s total crap. This guy is totally clueless, I really hope videogame journalism isn’t his occupation. So many misconceptions and so much bad logic…
Ps: “and like EA, they’re going to lose unless they start thinking differently” . = REALLY bad example, maybe Acclaim?
April 10th, 2007 at 9:05 pm
Actually, some of his points are well-taken. Even I, a hardened and faithful Nintendo fan, cannot argue with the failure that was the Virtual Boy. And his points about software problems on the Nintendo 64 are also accurate…yes, Zelda: Ocarina of Time and Super Mario 64 are two of the greatest games ever made. But what else did the system have to offer? Aside from Goldeneye 007, Starfox 64, Mario Kart 64 and Super Smash Bros., the Nintendo 64 had a comparatively weak library of games for a Nintendo console. Even the GameCube has a stronger catalogue.
But including the Wii on that list is a bit premature. Certainly, there is a slight possibility that the Wii could end up being a mistake. But we won’t know for another few years, and that being said, the Wii is cleaning up in the market…so to assume its failure so early in the game is ridiculous.
Even the PS3 shouldn’t be counted out yet, and Sony can’t give those things away. Bad arguments in that regard, sir.
April 10th, 2007 at 9:10 pm
I really enjoyed this article, because it made me laugh. It amazes me how some people can’t see facts when there right in there face. Great comments Jack!
April 11th, 2007 at 7:31 am
“The quality of some of these games be damned for now, because money talks, and developers are shifting resources to confirm that.” So you’re actually proud of that? Quality be damned?
April 11th, 2007 at 11:51 am
I’m a realist, anon. You don’t get perfection every time, but that is no reason to stop trying to make great games. You have to break a few eggs to make an omelet, etc etc.
April 11th, 2007 at 1:20 pm
Great column, and well said.